http://nkimepx7nuhyzeiy5flekrhwzvuoseowpmxdlu6hw5swqx22qdyhdgqd.onion/homesteading-and-property-rights.html
Well, this would mean that B would be a mere mouthpiece for C and thus A would actually be arguing with C which contradicts the
presumption that A is arguing
with B . Therefore, you could
never propose that someone else is a slave without contradiction, in
trying to demonstrate to this man that he is your or someone elses
slave, you would have to first assume that he owns himself, then propose
that you or someone else owns him—i.e. that he does not own himself.